The appearance of compensation despite an absence of compensation within each subpopulation. When the individuals of a species or population are not the primary target of harvesting but constitute incidental catch, they are termed `bycatch’. Bycatch spans the spectrum of marine fauna, including fish, seabirds, marine mammals, turtles and benthic invertebrates [19] and constitutes a harvesting pressure. Although some progress has been made in estimating the impact of harvesting non-target species, the demographic, Lasalocid (sodium)MedChemExpress Lasalocid (sodium) evolutionary and population-level consequences of bycatch remain relatively understudied [20]. Given the heterogeneity of the behavior of individuals in wild populations, some individuals may be moreDifferential Susceptibility to Bycatchsusceptible to bycatch and more likely to be removed from the populations. The heterogeneity in susceptibility to human-induced mortality, either through harvest or bycatch, is a form of selection. In this study, we test this hypothesis by investigating the evidence for heterogeneity in survival at the individual level in a population of a seabird species, the wandering albatross Diomedea exulans, which is heavily affected by bycatch in fisheries [21]. Although we use this species as a case study, the approach is quite general and can be applied to other study situations and taxa. We also model the dynamics of a population of wandering albatrosses, taking into account this hidden heterogeneity, and compare it with conventional models based on estimates of breeding population size from observed count data.Background and PredictionsWandering albatrosses from Possession Island, in the Crozet Islands within the southern Indian Ocean, forage from subAntarctic to sub-tropical waters while breeding [22], and extend their range from South Africa to New Zealand while not breeding [23]. The foraging areas of this population overlap with the fishing areas of demersal longliners targeting Patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides in sub-Antarctic waters, and major pelagic longline fisheries targeting southern bluefin tuna Thunnus maccoyii and albacore Thunnus alalunga in temperate and sub-tropical waters [24]. Individuals foraging at sea may be caught in longlines [25], and bycatch from these fisheries is known to affect adult survival [26] and population dynamics of albatrosses [21,27]. Although there is evidence that the increase in longline fishing effort (and associated bycatch) from the 1960s to the mid-1980s in the southern Indian Ocean probably Avermectin B1aMedChemExpress Avermectin B1a increased adult mortality and decreased breeding population size, wandering albatrosses from Possession Island have increased in numbers since the mid-1980s, despite very high levels of longline fishing effort in their foraging areas. In addition, age- and stage-structured population models explicitly modeling bycatch poorly fitted the observed data fromthe Crozet Islands [27]. This conundrum cannot be explained by the implementation of mitigating measures to reduce albatross bycatch, since (i) these measures were not adopted until the late 1990s and compliance was low in the first years of implementation [28], (ii) mitigation would have affected only the part of the fisheries that overlapped with the foraging areas of wandering albatrosses [28], (iii) albatross bycatch mortality remained high in tuna longline fleets in the southern Indian Ocean where similar, although less numerous, mitigation measures were implemented [29], and (iv) large Illegal Unrepor.The appearance of compensation despite an absence of compensation within each subpopulation. When the individuals of a species or population are not the primary target of harvesting but constitute incidental catch, they are termed `bycatch’. Bycatch spans the spectrum of marine fauna, including fish, seabirds, marine mammals, turtles and benthic invertebrates [19] and constitutes a harvesting pressure. Although some progress has been made in estimating the impact of harvesting non-target species, the demographic, evolutionary and population-level consequences of bycatch remain relatively understudied [20]. Given the heterogeneity of the behavior of individuals in wild populations, some individuals may be moreDifferential Susceptibility to Bycatchsusceptible to bycatch and more likely to be removed from the populations. The heterogeneity in susceptibility to human-induced mortality, either through harvest or bycatch, is a form of selection. In this study, we test this hypothesis by investigating the evidence for heterogeneity in survival at the individual level in a population of a seabird species, the wandering albatross Diomedea exulans, which is heavily affected by bycatch in fisheries [21]. Although we use this species as a case study, the approach is quite general and can be applied to other study situations and taxa. We also model the dynamics of a population of wandering albatrosses, taking into account this hidden heterogeneity, and compare it with conventional models based on estimates of breeding population size from observed count data.Background and PredictionsWandering albatrosses from Possession Island, in the Crozet Islands within the southern Indian Ocean, forage from subAntarctic to sub-tropical waters while breeding [22], and extend their range from South Africa to New Zealand while not breeding [23]. The foraging areas of this population overlap with the fishing areas of demersal longliners targeting Patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides in sub-Antarctic waters, and major pelagic longline fisheries targeting southern bluefin tuna Thunnus maccoyii and albacore Thunnus alalunga in temperate and sub-tropical waters [24]. Individuals foraging at sea may be caught in longlines [25], and bycatch from these fisheries is known to affect adult survival [26] and population dynamics of albatrosses [21,27]. Although there is evidence that the increase in longline fishing effort (and associated bycatch) from the 1960s to the mid-1980s in the southern Indian Ocean probably increased adult mortality and decreased breeding population size, wandering albatrosses from Possession Island have increased in numbers since the mid-1980s, despite very high levels of longline fishing effort in their foraging areas. In addition, age- and stage-structured population models explicitly modeling bycatch poorly fitted the observed data fromthe Crozet Islands [27]. This conundrum cannot be explained by the implementation of mitigating measures to reduce albatross bycatch, since (i) these measures were not adopted until the late 1990s and compliance was low in the first years of implementation [28], (ii) mitigation would have affected only the part of the fisheries that overlapped with the foraging areas of wandering albatrosses [28], (iii) albatross bycatch mortality remained high in tuna longline fleets in the southern Indian Ocean where similar, although less numerous, mitigation measures were implemented [29], and (iv) large Illegal Unrepor.