Having said that, in HE-MAC, the of manage messages, the transmission slightly packets
Nonetheless, in HE-MAC, the of control messages, the transmission slightly packets, and energy harvesting from one hundred to 200 bytes since the proportion on the energy the packet size increasesare all performed in the exact same frequency band. As presented in superframe is reduced. Quantitatively, the average harvesting time inside the WET Table two, the average harvested power of REE-MAC and FF-WPT are pretty much REE-MAC is 17.79 packet size increasesthan that of 200 bytes,when harvested power of PF-05105679 Purity & Documentation identical, even if the and 18.38 higher from 100 to FF-WPT because the packet size the not along with the typical harvested power of PRUs in out-of-band the PRUs transmitdoes 100- affect200-byte packets, respectively. In addition, the average approaches. Nevertheless, in HE-MAC, the typical harvested energy decreases HE-MAC harvested energy of REE-MAC is 132.15 and 159.04 greater than that ofslightly when the packet size increases 100- and 200-byte packets, respectively. when the PRUs transmit thefrom 100 to 200 bytes because the proportion in the power harvesting time inside the WET superframe is decreased. Quantitatively, the typical harvested power of REE-MAC is 17.79 and 18.38 greater than that of FF-WPT when the PRUs transmit the 100- and 200-byte packets, respectively. In addition, the average harvested power of REE-MAC is 132.15 and 159.04 higher than that of HE-MAC when the PRUs transmit the 100- and 200-byte packets, respectively.Sensors 2021, 21,13 ofTable two. Average harvested energy (mJ). Packet Size 100 bytes Quantity of PRUs Protocol REE-MAC FF-WPT HE-MAC REE-MAC FF-WPT HE-MAC 2 two.65 2.57 1.31 two.65 two.57 1.20 four 1.56 1.47 0.72 1.56 1.47 0.65 six 1.03 0.95 0.48 1.03 0.95 0.44 8 0.76 0.67 0.35 0.76 0.67 0.32 10 0.61 0.51 0.28 0.61 0.51 0.25 12 0.52 0.41 0.24 0.52 0.41 0.21 14 0.48 0.36 0.20 0.46 0.36 0.18 16 0.41 0.30 0.18 0.41 0.30 0.16 18 0.36 0.25 0.16 0.36 0.25 0.14 20 0.31 0.21 0.14 0.31 0.21 0.200 bytesFigure 6a,b illustrate the variations within the typical consumed power for 100- and 200-byte packets, respectively. In REE-MAC, the average consumed energy decreases because the variety of PRUs increases because the quantity of information GLPG-3221 Membrane Transporter/Ion Channel packets transmitted by PRUs gradually decreases as a result of boost in collisions and backoff delay. Consequently, the number of transmissions of PRUs is decreased, decreasing the energy consumed by PRUs. In FF-WPT, as in REE-MAC, the average consumed energy tends to reduce all round as the number of PRUs increases. In addition, FF-WPT exhibits an average consumed energy comparable to REE-MAC. On the other hand, in some sections (i.e., when the number of PRUs is 14 to 18), the typical consumed power of FF-WPT slightly increases. As the number of PRUs increases, the power every PRU can harvest decreases, and accordingly, the number of PRUs getting into the freezing state increases. Thus, a comparatively tiny number of PRUs transmit data packets for the PTU, plus the average consumed power can increase because of the reduced contention level. HE-MAC exhibits reduce typical consumed energy compared with both REE-MAC and FF-WPT. In HE-MAC, the PRUs have fairly couple of transmission possibilities for data packets mainly because each WET and WIT operations are performed within the exact same frequency band. Consequently, a modest quantity of information packet transmissions reduces the power consumed by the PRU. Quantitatively, when the PRUs transmit 100- and 200-byte packets, the average consumed power of REE-MAC is 7.79 and 8.29 larger than that of FF-WPT, respectively. Moreover, it can be 43.78 and 43.