F the key nesiotic space of Seleucids, the maritime district of
F the main nesiotic space of Seleucids, the maritime district of `Tylos and also the islands’ (Kosmin 2013, p. 70).2 The maritime district on the Persian Gulf strengthened the hold from the Hydroxyflutamide References Seleucids more than the region and reinforced connections amongst the islands.three The Seleucids, in an effort to consolidate their presence around the island, erected a fortress (found at region F5), close to the ruins of a creating, likely a temple-tower of an older civilisation and situated on the southwest corner from the island. This location formed a safe spot for the defence as well as the protection on the island.four This enclosure was probably constructed for the mercenaries of your Seleucid garrison, for the defence in the region and for the protection in the two temples erected therein and in the wells of fresh water5 that lay within the fortification. Small islands in the Aegean also display Hellenistic fortifications. Inside the view of Constantakopoulou (2007, p. 198) `the Hellenistic towers discovered on numerous islands may possibly add to our understanding in the significance of islands for sustaining connectivity inside the Aegean’. Exactly the same is correct for the fortress of Ikaros/Failaka, if we regard it as a a part of a chain of fortifications or fortified temples erected inside the Seleucid kingdom.Religions 2021, 12,7 ofOR PEER REVIEWThe island, even though situated around the really edge from the Seleucid empire, was each connected with Seleucid military policies and formed a part of the Seleucid religious programme. As Canepa (2018, p. 172) notes, `the Seleucids, in effect, strategically developed a ritual stage and spatial context that tied the settlement to the Empire’. The erection of new temples, the use or the reuse of old local temples along with the manipulation of regional eastern traditions was one of key objectives of Seleucids’ religious policy (Canepa 2018, p. 179). Thus, the island, which currently had a long religious tradition, became subject to Seleucid religious policy and hence part of a network of fortresses, temples and cities, including Jebel Khalid, Dura-Europus, Ai Khanum, Takht-e Sangin, and (most likely) Seleukeia-on-the-Tigris, exactly where the Seleucids combined cultural components and practices of Babylonian, Persian of 17Greek 10 and traditions, to make `a unifying focal point for each their Greco-Macedonian elites and pre-existing populations’ (Canepa 2018, p. 172) (Figure 3).Figure three. Map from the Middle East displaying of Ikaros/Failaka. The map was developed by the author applying Google Figure three. Map of the Middle East displaying the positionthe position of Ikaros/Failaka. The map was produced by Earth author working with Google Earth Pro maps. the Pro maps.The temples, shrines and fortifications in these areas might have had a symbolic function. The areas and also the way in which they had been erected throughout the Seleucid kingdom amongst Greek and neighborhood traditions is dynasties a message with the cultural dialogue communicated to indigenous populations and localalso evident in theSeleucid dominion more than a vast location (Freyberger 2016). These buildings also promoted and fortress, whose architectural structure and temples combine nearby architectural forms a notion of connectivity and unity inside a varied ethnic environment, with Babylonian and Achaemenid practices with Greek standard architectural styles, thereby creatingGreco-Macedonian characteristics, a (Z)-Semaxanib Epigenetics hybrid cultural architectural practices and religious traditions blending with identity. The Hellenistic fortress stood around the cultural components all through the Middle East. same to creat.