Ed unit ration unit ongoing adjustments influenced the micelle/monomer ration at the same time as micelleas nicely as Each elevated. Each ongoing size. Both ongoing adjustments influenced the micelle/monomer ration as well as micelle size. micelle size.200 200 qeHDTMA (mg g-1 qeHDTMA (mg g-1) ) 150 150 100 100 50 50 0CL-Na CL-NaCH-Na CH-Na 1.1.1.61 1.1.64 1.1.70 1.1.38 1.1.44 1.1.48 1.1.51 1.VB (mL) 300 20 ten 5 650 43.three 21.6 ten.eight V (mL) 300 20 ten five 650 43.3 21.6 ten.eight CB 325.79 292.11 271.49 258.72 219.72 202.82 186.85 158.ten eHDTMA (mg L-1) Nimbolide References CeHDTMA (mg L-1) 325.79 292.11 271.49 258.72 219.72 202.82 186.85 158.10 qeHDTMA (mg g-1) 62.08 64.96 66.73 67.82 154.20 157.33 160.30 165.64 qeHDTMA (mg g-1) 62.08 64.96 66.73 67.82 154.20 157.33 160.30 165.64 Figure 3. Effect of surfactant option batching (B) on efficiency of zeolite modification in sealing circulation unit. DC Figure values over the bars, Q =solution batching (B) =(B)efficiency , of =of zeolite = two.0 ECEC.inin sealing circulationunit. DC values three. Impact of surfactant four mL min-1, batching 1050 efficiency 40 , x modification sealing circulation unit. DC Figure 3. Influence of surfactant solutionC0 HDTMA on onmg L-1 T zeolite modification L-1 T 1 T , C, x ECEC. values over the bars, Q = 4 mL min-1,1 CCHDTMA = 1050 mgmg ,L-= ,40 = 40x= 2.0 = 2.0 ECEC. over the bars, Q = 4 mL min- , 0 0 HDTMA =B (-) B (-)11530601153060At the starting from the procedure, in the course of the time of single batch circulation, probably the most At the At the starting procedure, through the time of single single circulation, by far the most most starting from the with the method, throughout the batch batch circulation, the quickly sorbed have been micelles using the Thromboxane B2 Description highest time of aggregation number as possessing the rapidly sorbedsorbed micelles with the highest aggregation quantity as possessing the the swiftly were charge. They rearrange around the negative zeolite surface as space highest optimistic were micelles using the highest aggregation quantity as possessingand highest good charge. TheyThey rearrange on the unfavorable zeolite surface as space and charge and highest optimistic charge. rearrange around the negative zeolite surface as charge permit forming loosely packed bilayer [9]. Then, smaller sized sized micelles and chargepermit forming loosely packed bilayer [9]. [9]. Then, smaller sized sized micelles monomers permit forming loosely packed bilayer Then, smaller sized micelles and and monomers could also take part in the improve of density of packed bilayer. With all the monomers could take part in the raise of density of packed bilayer. Together with the the could also also participate in the enhance of density of packed bilayer. With batching batching advancement, the surface coverage elevated causing hydrophobicity with the batching advancement, the surface coverage increased causing hydrophobicity with the and advancement, the surface coverage enhanced causing hydrophobicity from the surface repulsion of hydrophilic micelles. Simultaneously, as every subsequent batch became much more diluted in the moment it reached the fixed bed, the surfactant resolution contained additional monomers. As a result of a smaller size, they could migrate via intramicellar channelsMaterials 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW10 ofMaterials 2021, 14,surface and repulsion of hydrophilic micelles. Simultaneously, as every subsequent batch 19 9 of became far more diluted at the moment it reached the fixed bed, the surfactant resolution contained much more monomers. Due to a smaller size, they could migrate by way of intramicellar channel.