Unebri. High density: 1.5 m two m; low density: 1.5 m 4 m.In line with Tables three and S2, the niche overlap of dominant shrubs inside the patterns of different compositions and densities can be obtained (Table four), as well as the diversity of shrubs is higher in the patterns with decrease niche overlap of dominant shrubs. For instance, theForests 2021, 12,9 ofoverlap of dominant shrubs in high-density pure forests is reduced than that of low-density pure forests, and also the overlaps of dominant shrubs within the Cf pattern will be the highest, though the overlap of dominant shrubs inside the two mixed tree species patterns is reduce than that of pure forests and also the three tree species mixed using the exact same density, which is opposite for the distribution of shrub diversity in each model.Table four. The niche overlap of dominant shrubs in different reconstruction patterns. Proportion of Total Value Value 72.739 Average Niche OverlapPatternsDominant Shrub Myrsine africana Vitex negundo Alangium chinense Myrsine africana Broussonetia papyrifera Rubus coreanus Rhus chinensis Broussonetia papyrifera Myrsine africana Broussonetia papyrifera Ligustrum lucidum Zanthoxylum bungeanum Rhus chinensis Broussonetia papyrifera Zanthoxylum bungeanum Broussonetia papyrifera Rhus chinensis Vitex negundo Rhus chinensis Broussonetia papyrifera Vitex negundo Pyracantha fortuneana Rubus coreanus Vitex negundo Vitex negundo Rhus chinensis Broussonetia papyrifera Rubus coreanus Vitex negundo Rhus chinensis Broussonetia papyrifera Vitex negundo Rhus chinensis Broussonetia papyrifera Rhus chinensis Pyracantha fortuneanaImportance Value 27.993 27.113 17.633 16.688 10.65 eight.499 28.872 20.97 8.242 23.396 eight.668 8.196 28 26.653 20.633 32.873 27.833 20.297 16.611 14.668 14.121 20.598 14.215 13.774 28.201 14.052 11.953 21.699 13.467 11.543 22.803 21.755 20.247 31.286 16.092 12.Niche Overlap 0.592 0.799 0.74 0.469 0.918 0.501 0.918 0.469 0.501 0.561 0.78 0.292 0.918 0.771 0.78 0.981 0.692 0.641 0.918 0.641 0.78 0.702 0.528 0.449 0.641 0.692 0.918 0.449 0.489 0.641 0.692 0.918 0.641 0.918 0.612 0.Cf0.7103 0.Ts-H35.0.6293 0.Cs-H58.0.6293 0.Ac-H40.0.5443 0.Ts-L75.0.8230 0.Cs-L81.0.7713 0.Ac-L45.0.7797 0.TA48.0.5597 0.TC54.0.7503 0.CA46.0.5263 0.ATC64.0.7503 0.CB59.0.7010 0.Ac-H: high-density Alnus cremastogyne; Ts-H: high-density Toona sinensis; Cs-H: high-density Cinnamomum septentrionale; TC: Ts Cs; CA: Cs Ac; TA: Ts Ac; ATC: Ac Ts Cs; Ac-L: low-density Alnus cremastogyne; Ts-L: low-density Toona sinensis; Cs-L: low-density Cinnamomum septentrionale; CB: cutting-blank; Cf: Cupressus funebri. High density: 1.5 m two m; low density: 1.5 m 4 m.4. Discussion For plantations with poor tree diversity, understory vegetation is definitely an crucial part of the diversity of the complete plantation, supplying a habitat and meals for many organisms, promoting nutrient cycling, stopping erosion, and affecting seed germination andForests 2021, 12,10 ofseedlings in the forest ecosystem with regard to survival and growth [22]. Within this study, we carried out distinct patterns of cypress forest transformation, and studied and JMS-053 custom synthesis revealed the diversity of understory shrubs in stands with Zaragozic acid E Technical Information various tree compositions and density and the partnership among their shrub niches. The outcomes showed that the tree composition and density had a substantial effect around the diversity of shrubs, and that the niche is closely connected to the diversity of shrubs. In each transformation pattern, the overlap in the niche of your shrub diversity plus the dom.