Sd heritability may very well be explained by the way sv was calculated from ds. Certainly, sv was estimated from sd applying the formula of the volume in the sphere. This transformation improved the total phenotypic variance of trait sv by a coefficient (4/3), devoid of affecting the sv error variance. Hence, the higher the genetic variance, the greater the heritability of sv trait. This result need to be verified because the volume of spermatheca was approximated to that of a sphere, despite the fact that this organ may well show different shapes [46]. The estimates for the number of ovarioles and for the number of sperm within the spermatheca had been 0.70 0.35 and 0.57 0.35, respectively. You can find no final results within the literature so far on the heritabilities for the traits measured in this study. General, the outcomes show considerable genetic variability within the studied population. Concerning morphological traits (bw, hw, tw, aw, hwi, twi, awi, wl), phenotypic correlations ranged from 0.16 to 0.88. Very correlated traits had been physique weight with abdomen weight (0.88 0.03) and thorax weight (0.67 0.06); furthermore, a o-3M3FBS custom synthesis correlation of 0.80 0.04 resulted involving abdomen and thorax BMY-14802 In Vivo widths. Reduce correlations were observed between morphological traits along with the length in the ideal forewing. We observed incredibly low or close to zero phenotypic correlations amongst reproductive traits (ds, vs., o, sp) except for the correlation amongst sd and sv (0.97 0.01). The latter is probably explained by the truth that sv is derived by sd employing the formula to estimate the volume of a sphere. Remarkably, based on our outcomes, reproductive traits usually do not seem to be linked with morphological measures. Our results are in agreement with Corbella and Gon lves [56], Hatch et al. [45], and Jackson et al. [36] who also reported the lack of phenotypic correlation involving the body weight of a queen along with the variety of ovarioles. Moreover, no phenotypic correlation among the number of sperms and spermatheca diameter was located, as previously reported by Jackson et al. [36].Animals 2021, 11,9 ofTable two. Heritabilities (diagonal and in bold), genetic (above diagonal) and phenotypic (below diagonal) correlations estimates for traits measured on queens. Typical errors for heritability estimate are reported in brackets. Trait Body weight Head weight Thorax weight Abdomen weight Head width Thorax width Abdomen width Wing length Diameter spermatheca Volume spermatheca Ovarioles number Sperm count Body Weight 0.54 (0.34) 0.39 (0.10) 0.67 (0.06) 0.88 (0.03) 0.36 (0.09) 0.34 (0.ten) 0.39 (0.09) 0.34 (0.ten) 0.21 (0.10) 0.22 (0.13) 0.01 (0.12) 0.03 (0.12) Head Weight 0.80 (0.31) 0.51 (0.35) 0.19 (0.11) 0.31 (0.10) 0.31 (0.10) 0.30 (0.ten) 0.17 (0.10) 0.16 (0.ten) 0.04 (0.12) 0.03 (0.13) 0.15 (0.12) 0.03 (0.12) Thorax Weight 0.92 (0.30) 0.99 (0.36) 0.50 (0.39) 0.29 (0.10) 0.28 (0.ten) 0.28 (0.11) 0.26 (0.10) 0.36 (0.10) 0.18 (0.12) 0.11 (0.12) Abdomen Weight 0.84 (0.17) 0.61 (0.45) 0.98 (0.69) 0.46 (0.34) 0.27 (0.ten) 0.26 (0.10) 0.33 (0.ten) 0.20 (0.11) 0.20 (0.ten) 0.18 (0.13) Head Width 0.47 (0.50) 0.97 (0.46) Thorax Width 0.34 (0.50) 0.34 (0.53) 0.83 (0.31) Abdomen Width Wing Length 0.17 (0.62) 0.92 (0.71) 0.74 (0.38) Diameter Volume Spermatheca Spermatheca 0.23 (0.76) 0.40 (0.40) Ovarioles Quantity Sperm Count-0.22 (1.ten) -0.56 (1.05)0.54 (0.75)-0.13 (0.50)0.28 (0.50)-0.13 (0.52)0.23 (0.57) 0.15 (0.58)-0.44 (0.68)0.78 (0.39)-0.44 (0.50)0.61 (0.41) 0.06 (0.54) 0.7 (0.52) 0.44 (0.43) 0.44 (0.65) 0.40 (0.50) 0.99 (0.02) 0.88 (0.