Minority protection regime shouldReligions 2021, 12,11 ofobligate the state to protect a religious minority’s distinct cultural and linguistic way of practicing their religion. 4.2. Positive Measures to Shield: Supplementing a Damaging Liberty to Religious freedom Secondly, a LAU159 GABA Receptor single possible added advantage of a minority protection frame, as opposed to religious freedom frame, lies in the nature of state obligation. When religious freedom tends to be couched as a adverse liberty, i.e., as rights against state interference, minority protection regimes require the state to take constructive measures “necessary to guard the identity of a minority and also the rights of its members to take pleasure in and develop their culture and language and to practise their religion, in neighborhood together with the other members with the group” CCPR Basic Comment No. 23: Short article 27 (Rights of Minorities) (1994). In accordance with the Human Rights Committee, the protection of rights of persons belonging to minority groups is “directed towards making certain the survival and continued improvement of the cultural, religious and social identity with the minorities concerned, therefore enriching the fabric of society as a whole” CCPR Basic Comment No. 23: Report 27 (Rights of Minorities) (1994). This may well entail autonomy and educational rights, for 1-Dodecanol-d25 Technical Information example providing sources for parents to understand their ideal to educate their young children in line with their own faith. Constructive measures to defend religious autonomy may perhaps also encompass allocating state resources to administer private law for religious minorities. One particular can see this as an example in Singapore where the constitutional obligation imposed around the government to care for the Muslim minorities is partly fulfilled via a constitutionally authorized individual Muslim law technique. Below Singapore’s Administration of Muslim Law Act, a technique of Syariah courts/tribunals and an Islamic religious council administers Islamic-based laws within the places of marriage, divorce, inheritance, and religious obligations (bin Abbas 2012). The accommodation of religious minorities through constructive state obligations to help religious activities can level the playing field amongst minority communities and the basic population, specifically vis-vis the religious majority (Shachar 2001, p. two). Notably, this goes beyond a typical aspect of religious freedom proper for religious groups to manage their very own affairs and to establish their very own institutions (Ahdar and Leigh 2015, pp. 3756). Such rights are adverse rights; guaranteeing that religious groups take pleasure in freedom from state intervention within the regulation of their very own affairs. Notably, such systems of autonomy may well “unwittingly enable systematic maltreatment of individuals inside the accommodated group” (Shachar 2001, p. two) and result in insulating religious practices from constitutional values (Kymlicka 1995, p. 153). A single such certain conflict is in between religious autonomy and equality. Okin, as an illustration, argues that since some group rights can, in fact, endanger women, we ought to not accept group rights that permit oppressive practices simply because it can be claimed that they’re fundamental to minority cultures whose existence may well otherwise be threatened (Okin 1999). A state-supported regime of autonomy for religious minorities could, at instances, be more effective at reconciling constitutional commitments to equality and religious minority protection. Shachar has also argued for a “joint governance” strategy aimed at enhancing j.