Omeone touching their private belongings led to encounter of touch on their own physique (e.g “a prickling sensation on the back of my neck PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21540755 that is definitely each painful and pleasurable”).Note that these participants supplied this information inside a comment box despite the fact that they weren’t directly asked about these perceptions, so the occurrence is undoubtedly higher than what we discovered.As opposed to perceptions in response to lamps (Banissy et al), every of our three participants reported this experience particularly for their individual possessions.This suggests that emotion may perhaps play a function in the encounter of tactile phenomena for instance mirrortouch and synesthesia.Even though some participants’ tactile experiences generalized to strangers and fictional characters, numerous reported that their mirrortouch responses were enhanced foror even restricted topeople with whom they feel close.Such reports are consistent with earlier findings, like those displaying that mirrortouch perceptions are stronger for observed touch of real bodies than of dummy bodies (n ; Holle et al).Ticker tape experiences also showed a wealth of individual differences, as reported in semistructured interviews of participants recruited from our sample for an additional study (Chun and Hup [Abstract]; ticker tape males, girls).Most participants reported a continual size and font for visualized letters; nonetheless, some folks reported experiencing a adjust in letter size depending on the volume with which words are spoken.Frontiers in Psychology Cognitive ScienceNovember Volume Article Chun and HupMirrortouch, ticker tape, and synesthesiaThe way in which ticker tape perceptions were “displayed” varied at the same time we received reports of both static show, on a screen inside the head or in front on the body, and dynamic show, with words that stream out through the mouth or from behind the head.1 ticker taper reported that through a verbal fluency task, suggestions “stacked up” visually behind her head prior to streaming by way of her mouth as she said them aloud.When also quite a few ideas had been becoming held there, some would disappear before she could say them and hence disappeared from memory.A subset of ticker tapers described visualizing noises spelled out onomatopoetically (“as in a comic book”), whereas other individuals Lumicitabine Epigenetics didn’t.Likewise, some ticker tapers reported spelling out words phonetically from an unknown language although for other folks, ticker tape seemed directly linked to comprehension they reported that hearing a language they do not realize would fail to elicit ticker tape.PREVALENCE COMPARISONSthe use of different populations, distinct recruitment and sampling strategies, and distinct diagnostic criteria amongst studies, their comparability is arguably restricted.Having said that, prevalence estimates in the present study usually are not substantially different from these previously reported within the literature for graphemecolor and sequencespace associations, too as for initial selfreport of mirrortouch.Our estimates are slightly higher than prior reports for personcolor and temporal sequencecolor and are substantially larger than earlier prevalence estimates for OLP; hypotheses to explain such discrepancies are proposed below.Though the estimated prevalence of auditioncolor in the current study seems elevated compared to a previous report, this distinction could be due to the concerns we asked (see Appendix, Interior Experiences Survey) we asked participants whether they associated colors with sounds and voices, in addition to music (Simn.