Ted inside the posterior part of the best middle temporal gyrus,turned out to become predominantly related with verb processing; actionrelated activation in this brain region is often reported inside the literature even though its contribution is for some explanation neglected. It is actually only in current years that interest has been focused around the right posterior middle temporal gyrus in the course of action F 11440 processing (Kable et al. Tettamanti et al. Assmus et al. Deen and McCarthy. Assmus et al. ,for instance,explored the neural activations connected using a familiarity judgment on photographs representing wholebody actions (e.g dancing) vs. manipulable objects(e.g phone) and nonmanipulable objects (e.g motorway),observing increased bilateral activation within the middle temporal gyrus,the inferior and superior parietal cortex,and also the premotor cortex. Having said that,their study didn’t involve explicit linguistic processing,and so these places might just reflect the activation of actionrelated,human physique representation. This interpretation is supported by the truth that the posterior part of the superior temporal gyrus is typically linked with sensorymotor integration (e.g Bangert et al and is anatomically contiguous towards the visual region MT [x . ; y .; z .; Mendola et al ]. It could as a result be speculated that visuomotor processing and also the sensorimotor attributes of actions may have represented the phylogenetic and ontogenetic “point of entry” for the improvement of a a lot more comprehensive action information,which may possibly have evolved PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19546593 gradually into a far more basic verb expertise [for a similar argument on distinctive brain locations,see Aggujaro et al. and Berlingeri et al. ; see also Watson and Chatterjee ,for any general formulation from the “point of entry” theory]. In light of this hypothesis it is intriguing that a correct,and not left,hemisphere cluster within this location turned out to be associated with verbs: the two posterior middle temporal clusters identified by the algorithm in the left hemisphere contained precisely the same quantity of noun and verb peaks. This may be explained by the fact that most studies investigated tool nouns,as a result inducing activation to the left posterior temporal and inferior parietal regions,normally connected with tool use. This hypothesis offers a specific degree of support to weak embodied theories,which simply see abstract representations as related to their visuomotor counterpart. Verb representations would be linked to actionrelated,human physique facts,which,having said that,would by no implies constitute the core of verb representations; these latter have their very own stance independently of motoric facts,and relate to it through the mediation of higherlevel,modality independent neural systems (e.g Hagoort Bedny and Caramazza van Ackeren et al.CONCLUSIONThe metaanalysis described in this paper has confirmed that the neuroimaging evidence obtained so far on noun and verb processing will not indicate a fantastic deal of grammatical class specificity inside the brain,at the least at the spatial resolution ordinarily allowed by imaging experiments: most of the brain regions that have been regarded as as associated with noun and verbprocessing are shown to involve a statistically indistinguishable quantity of noun and verb peaks,if all the imaging research on this situation are regarded as with each other. These information are at odds with embodied theories of verb representation,in both the weak and robust variants,and also with all the broadly held account that verb processing relies on frontal locations and noun course of action.