Nistration regimen must be identified that reliably infects 100 of participants. Murine data have shown that the route of administration of cryopreserved sporozoites is a key determinant of infectivity. C57/ BL6 mice (n = 5 per group) were injected with 50,000 sporozoites administered by intravenous (IV), IM, subcutaneous (SC) or ID routes and subsequent parasite liver load determined by in vivo imaging. Results clearly demonstrated that IV administration was associated with the greatest infectivity. However, IM administration was the next most effective route of delivery, associated with greater infectivity than SC or ID routes of injection. [13] Given the potential practical limitations of an IV CHMI model and promising results already seen with ID administration of PfSPZ Challenge, we sought to conduct a trial to assess the infectivity of PfSPZ Challenge administered IM with a view to establishing a dosing regimen that reliably infects 100 of participants. The proposed trial provided a unique opportunity to examine ?Lixisenatide site immunological responses induced in malarial naive volunteers following the first episode of P. falciparum infection. Data frommurine and clinical studies have suggested a critical role of IFN-c producing T cells in reducing the liver burden of P. falciparum infection. [14?0]. However, infection has only been associated with modest responses to well known pre-erythrocytic antigens (such as Thrombospondin Related Adhesion Protein (TRAP), Circumsporozoite Surface Protein (CSP), Cell-Traversal protein for Ookinetes and Sporozoites (CelTOS), Liver Stage Antigen 1 (LSA1), Exported Protein 1 (EXP1) and Merozoite Surface Protein (MSP) [21?7] which have never been correlated with protection. We sought to assess T-cell responses to other novel preerythrocytic antigens in the hope of identifying new antigenic targets for future vaccine development.MethodsThe protocol for this trial and supporting CONSORT checklist are available as supporting information; see Checklist S1 and Protocol S1.ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate the infectivity of varying doses and routes of administration of aseptic cryopreserved P. falciparum sporozoites (PfSPZ Challenge) administered by needle and syringe.Study Design ParticipantsThe study was an open label, non-randomised pilot study with blinded laboratory outcome assessment (Figure 1). The study was conducted at the Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical ?Medicine, University of Oxford, UK. Healthy, malaria-naive males and non-pregnant females aged 18?5 years were invited to participate in the study. All participants gave written informed consent, and the study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) (see Materials Methods S1 for the full list of inclusion and exclusion criteria). Allocation to study groups occurred at screening according to volunteer preference.Ethical Regulatory ApprovalEthical MedChemExpress 301353-96-8 approval was granted by the UK National Research Ethics Committee South Central Oxford A (Ref: 11/SC/0351). UK regulatory approval of the trial was not necessary as PfSPZ Challenge is considered a non-investigational product in the UK. The study was reviewed and allowed to proceed by the US Food and Drug Administration under IND 14267. 1676428 The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01465048). The Local Safety Committee provided safety oversight and GCP compliance was independently monitore.Nistration regimen must be identified that reliably infects 100 of participants. Murine data have shown that the route of administration of cryopreserved sporozoites is a key determinant of infectivity. C57/ BL6 mice (n = 5 per group) were injected with 50,000 sporozoites administered by intravenous (IV), IM, subcutaneous (SC) or ID routes and subsequent parasite liver load determined by in vivo imaging. Results clearly demonstrated that IV administration was associated with the greatest infectivity. However, IM administration was the next most effective route of delivery, associated with greater infectivity than SC or ID routes of injection. [13] Given the potential practical limitations of an IV CHMI model and promising results already seen with ID administration of PfSPZ Challenge, we sought to conduct a trial to assess the infectivity of PfSPZ Challenge administered IM with a view to establishing a dosing regimen that reliably infects 100 of participants. The proposed trial provided a unique opportunity to examine ?immunological responses induced in malarial naive volunteers following the first episode of P. falciparum infection. Data frommurine and clinical studies have suggested a critical role of IFN-c producing T cells in reducing the liver burden of P. falciparum infection. [14?0]. However, infection has only been associated with modest responses to well known pre-erythrocytic antigens (such as Thrombospondin Related Adhesion Protein (TRAP), Circumsporozoite Surface Protein (CSP), Cell-Traversal protein for Ookinetes and Sporozoites (CelTOS), Liver Stage Antigen 1 (LSA1), Exported Protein 1 (EXP1) and Merozoite Surface Protein (MSP) [21?7] which have never been correlated with protection. We sought to assess T-cell responses to other novel preerythrocytic antigens in the hope of identifying new antigenic targets for future vaccine development.MethodsThe protocol for this trial and supporting CONSORT checklist are available as supporting information; see Checklist S1 and Protocol S1.ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate the infectivity of varying doses and routes of administration of aseptic cryopreserved P. falciparum sporozoites (PfSPZ Challenge) administered by needle and syringe.Study Design ParticipantsThe study was an open label, non-randomised pilot study with blinded laboratory outcome assessment (Figure 1). The study was conducted at the Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical ?Medicine, University of Oxford, UK. Healthy, malaria-naive males and non-pregnant females aged 18?5 years were invited to participate in the study. All participants gave written informed consent, and the study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) (see Materials Methods S1 for the full list of inclusion and exclusion criteria). Allocation to study groups occurred at screening according to volunteer preference.Ethical Regulatory ApprovalEthical approval was granted by the UK National Research Ethics Committee South Central Oxford A (Ref: 11/SC/0351). UK regulatory approval of the trial was not necessary as PfSPZ Challenge is considered a non-investigational product in the UK. The study was reviewed and allowed to proceed by the US Food and Drug Administration under IND 14267. 1676428 The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01465048). The Local Safety Committee provided safety oversight and GCP compliance was independently monitore.